<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Precedent to GOIâ€™s ordinance &#8211; The Australian experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/</link>
	<description>An egoist's road trip through life with cricket, music, books, cars and movies for company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: superstarksa</title>
		<link>http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-4041</link>
		<dc:creator>superstarksa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/#comment-4041</guid>
		<description>Adi: Why should the BCCI not ask for more money? I mean, if someone offers you a huge some of money to do something that you are very good at doing, will you not do it? And next time someone asks you, wouldn&#039;t you ask the same amount of money, or even more?

RJ: That&#039;s exactly what my view point is. But this post essentially was to show what the Australian government laid down as rules and what the Indian government passes off as rules. We all know that the ordinance is loaded in favor of the lazy asses in Sanchar Bhavan.

VC: pongi ezhanum! Adha vittutu!

Bongopondit: Yes, the government is feeding its own laziness and the funny thing is no one is talking about it. I think the fact is that everyone thinks that this issue is cricket related and so not worthy of discussion, but like I said in the post, to me the ordinance has great potential, if the government opens its eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adi: Why should the BCCI not ask for more money? I mean, if someone offers you a huge some of money to do something that you are very good at doing, will you not do it? And next time someone asks you, wouldn&#8217;t you ask the same amount of money, or even more?</p>
<p>RJ: That&#8217;s exactly what my view point is. But this post essentially was to show what the Australian government laid down as rules and what the Indian government passes off as rules. We all know that the ordinance is loaded in favor of the lazy asses in Sanchar Bhavan.</p>
<p>VC: pongi ezhanum! Adha vittutu!</p>
<p>Bongopondit: Yes, the government is feeding its own laziness and the funny thing is no one is talking about it. I think the fact is that everyone thinks that this issue is cricket related and so not worthy of discussion, but like I said in the post, to me the ordinance has great potential, if the government opens its eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi</title>
		<link>http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-4008</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/#comment-4008</guid>
		<description>The whole controvery is because of BCCI. Had BCCI not auctioned cricket for money, the whole thing would not have happened and there was no necessity of any law. Interestingly, nobody is blaming it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole controvery is because of BCCI. Had BCCI not auctioned cricket for money, the whole thing would not have happened and there was no necessity of any law. Interestingly, nobody is blaming it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>If the aim is to ensure that public gets a chance to view &quot;events of na(o?)tional importance&quot; then shouldn&#039;t DD just be relaying what ever the  private broadcasters are showing ( ads &amp; all) ? If loss minimization to DD is the main aim, then DD can quote its opportunity cost as the price for carrying the feed. I am sure all private broadcasters would jump at the opportunity to use DD&#039;s network for that price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the aim is to ensure that public gets a chance to view &#8220;events of na(o?)tional importance&#8221; then shouldn&#8217;t DD just be relaying what ever the  private broadcasters are showing ( ads &amp; all) ? If loss minimization to DD is the main aim, then DD can quote its opportunity cost as the price for carrying the feed. I am sure all private broadcasters would jump at the opportunity to use DD&#8217;s network for that price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesiPundit &#187; Archives &#187; Sharing sports feeds with DD</title>
		<link>http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-4003</link>
		<dc:creator>DesiPundit &#187; Archives &#187; Sharing sports feeds with DD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/#comment-4003</guid>
		<description>[...] has a post on the recent ordinance that forces private broadcasters to share their sports feeds with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a post on the recent ordinance that forces private broadcasters to share their sports feeds with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VC</title>
		<link>http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-3975</link>
		<dc:creator>VC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 05:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/#comment-3975</guid>
		<description>i shall sit this one out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i shall sit this one out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bongopondit</title>
		<link>http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-3924</link>
		<dc:creator>bongopondit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/#comment-3924</guid>
		<description>I believe in England, Wimbledon is required to be covered on over-the-air channels. Exceptions for certain major events could be made. 

But in this case, the government is simply giving in to a lazy and inefficient DD. Additionally, Nimbus agreed to share feed given that DD encrypted its broadcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in England, Wimbledon is required to be covered on over-the-air channels. Exceptions for certain major events could be made. </p>
<p>But in this case, the government is simply giving in to a lazy and inefficient DD. Additionally, Nimbus agreed to share feed given that DD encrypted its broadcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  news on civil law - newsdor.com</title>
		<link>http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/comment-page-1/#comment-5626</link>
		<dc:creator> news on civil law - newsdor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superstarksa.com/2007/02/01/precedent-to-gois-ordinance/#comment-5626</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;  Latest News &amp; Related Chat          DUI Lawyers Site Â» Bar sends ethics complaint to state Supreme... 2-4  remove     superstarksa.com &#124; Blog Archive &#124; Precedent to GOIâ€™s ordinance? 2-3  remove     Life at a Primary Health Centre: Details of Police Complaint 2-4  remove     ACSA Online : Legislation : Legislative Endorsements 2-6  remove     U.S. files Chinese trade complaint 2-4&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>  Latest News &#038; Related Chat          DUI Lawyers Site Â» Bar sends ethics complaint to state Supreme&#8230; 2-4  remove     superstarksa.com | Blog Archive | Precedent to GOIâ€™s ordinance? 2-3  remove     Life at a Primary Health Centre: Details of Police Complaint 2-4  remove     ACSA Online : Legislation : Legislative Endorsements 2-6  remove     U.S. files Chinese trade complaint 2-4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

